So are you saying that if the whistleblower was some sort of democratic plant, and that's a big if considering that everything he alleged has now been corroborated by multiple other people, that we should ignore all the evidence that's turned up in the meantime?
Honestly I'm not surprised that you doubt their, or any/all of the other witnesses, integrity. The republicans have basically come to the conclusion that no democrat can be an honorable american and that anyone who disagrees with them must be a democrat even if they claim not to be.