Impeachment?

[jp1]

But if you were correct when you said earlier that there was no real question of what happened, shouldn’t the focus be on whether the two articles are for impeachable offenses or not? If they don’t rise to that level, what would be the point of confirming what has already been established beyond putting points on the political board? What is so sinister about rules that allow the Senate to call witnesses as the Senate sees fit?

No, there's lots of speculation, opinion and second hand information out there. If this were a criminal proceeding it would be thrown out of court. I think the country deserves better.

Apparently there are people out there who won't be convinced until Guiliani, Pompeo, and Mulvaney testify in person to confirm what we already know.

It seems somewhat odd that they refuse to testify and clear things up if what we've already learned about their actions is inaccurate.