Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 87

Thread: Michelle Bachmann Ban On Porn?

  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,175
    Quote Originally Posted by loosechickens View Post
    It's not your father's Republican Party, and not even the Republican party of my youth and middle age......the folks running the show today make the old John Birchers look positively socialist.
    Even if Bachmann and Perry don't get the nomination, I think they do much to shift the center to the right.

    I remember not long ago when Hillary Clinton was running she was accused of being nothing more than a back door to Bill getting back into the White House. And I don't think anyone could construe "submissive" out of that relationship.

  2. #52
    Low Tech grunt iris lily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    4,945
    One reason why Bachman might be considered a viable candidate other than the fiction that the far right controls the Republican party is that she is a polished speaker with convictions about the national debt. Last time I looked that debt thing was pretty important in the polls.

    I was impressed with her performance in Ames. Pawlenty, who claims to be more to the right on abortion than any one on the stage that night, was unimpressive.

  3. #53
    Low Tech grunt iris lily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    4,945
    Quote Originally Posted by Spartana View Post
    Well I just heard on the news that she believes women should be submissive to the will of their husbands and do what they tell them. So maybe her stance on porn and other things aren't really "her" stance at all but her hubbys. Would anyone want a person in top office who felt it was her or his duty to submit to the will of their spouse? I think the top office holder needs to submit to the will of the people as their elected representative and no one else Especially not to one person who may have their own political agenda.
    They asked her the "submissive" question at the debate and she explained it as having respect for her spouse, just as he has respect for her.

    I personally am not making a big deal out of that. There are other issues of conservative social politics that I don't like, but the politics of personal attack aren't interesting to me although the mainstream media does love them. Also she looked really good on stage, a tad less pretty than Sarah Palin but much better looking than Tina Brown's image of a crazed one would have you believe.

  4. #54
    Low Tech grunt iris lily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    4,945
    Quote Originally Posted by alan View Post
    I guess that depends on how "the news" chose to frame the issue. When asked about the whole "submissive" thing, she replied that she and her husband respected each others wishes. That seemed reasonable to me.
    Really, I should read all responses before I post. You will notice that I posted practically the same thing. haha.

  5. #55
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,877
    Quote Originally Posted by Iris lily View Post
    I personally am not making a big deal out of that. There are other issues of conservative social politics that I don't like, but the politics of personal attack aren't interesting to me although the mainstream media does love them. Also she looked really good on stage, a tad less pretty than Sarah Palin but much better looking than Tina Brown's image of a crazed one would have you believe.
    Isn't that an interesting aspect of the media and political discourse these days? I think the lengths that publications and private individuals go to in order to make someone appear unreasonable, offensive or odd is telling. Not so much for the candidate, but for their commenters.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,175
    Quote Originally Posted by alan View Post
    Isn't that an interesting aspect of the media and political discourse these days? I think the lengths that publications and private individuals go to in order to make someone appear unreasonable, offensive or odd is telling. Not so much for the candidate, but for their commenters.
    It's what sells. At the end of the day, the only reason they are there is to make money.

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    And sometimes, persons simply ARE unreasonable, offensive and odd, and all the media has to do is run up video after video of them hanging themselves with their very own words and positions on issues over a period of years. And the media will find riches in their archives of speeches and comments by Michelle Bachmann that will offend and horrify most mainstream Americans.

    She may attempt artful pivots about submissive wives, but the record of her thoughts on those matters contains lots of "submissive" comments and only VERY recently, it morphed into "respect".

    It's been said that Michelle Bachmann is Sarah Palin if Sarah Palin were articulate, and undeniably Ms. Bachmann has done very well in the debates, etc. As I remember, Allen Keyes was WONDERFUL in the debates, but it didn't mean that he wasn't something of a nutcase, and Michelle Bachmann's ability to be articulate doesn't mean that what she believes is anything that any but a small percentage of Americans would find attactive once she is examined carefully. Which a Presidential campaign leaves lots of opportunity to do.

    Look, if you conservatives want her or Rick Perry, go for it. Personally, if you want to beat President Obama, you need a lot more gravitas and ability than either of them possess. I would fear several other candidates as competition for President Obama far more, myself.

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    Ah, from Fox News to the Dogs ears..........

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/...-gop-out-step/

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    hmmmm......this, from the Huffington Post. Significant not for what Michelle Bachmann's husband said, but for what he DIDN'T say......I think I rest my case......... (plus, it's time to head for the pool for evening swim...g'nite)

    "AMES, IOWA -- Marcus Bachmann, standing off to the side of the stage a few minutes before his wife spoke, told The Huffington Post he was optimistic about her chances in the poll.

    "I appreciate the weather cooperating," he said, referring to the gorgeous, mid-80's day.

    HuffPost asked him if he thought it was appropriate and fair for a question to be asked of his wife in the debate Thursday night about whether she would be "submissive" to him, her husband, if she were president.

    "The answer was brilliant," he said.

    I asked him again.

    "They need to focus on what's important in this country," Marcus Bachmann said, pointing to jobs and the economy as the topics that should take priority. "It's unfortunate that they focus on things that are not as important."

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    o.k. I really AM headed for the pool....just couldn't resist this.......much closer to my own take on whether wives should be submissive...... ;-)

    Husband reads a book : "You are the man of your house"! So he storms to his wife and announces- "From now on you need to know I'm the man of the house. My word is LAW. You WILL cook & clean for me.You WILL go upstairs & give me the kind of sex I want. After, you WILL draw me a bath wash my back & massage my feet. Oh, & guess who's going to dress me & comb my hair in the morning?.." The wife replied, "A freaking funeral director would be my 1st guess!"

    g'nite......

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •