Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
I see that a Johns Hopkins study shows that all of the lockdown/no congregating/shelter-in-place efforts that were such a big part of our initial Covid response were statistically irrelevant to the overall Covid fatality count. Do you think that is disinformation spread by conspiracy theorists or if it's found acceptable, does that mean the people saying the same thing last year and the year before were not spreading disinformation afterall?
The best case of science of the day can change what ever current best practice is. I suppose there is a very remote possibility that some day they will prove that vaccines cause long term brain damage and contain Bill Gates chips to trace people. Then all the guys who have been banned or red flagged from social medias can say, I told you so.