Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
Other than her stupid **** definition of quarantine?
In my scanning of the 59 page decision I didn't notice the judge's definition of quarantine, although she did reference the term as it has previously been applied in other court and legislative renderings. As an example, several courts last year ruled that the mandatory wearing of a mask was a form of personal quarantine and without a lawful quarantine order, forcing people to wear masks exceeded government authority.

Is the use of that standing legal principle the one you find stupid?

Edited to add: The ruling can be found here for anyone interested.