Conavirus......

[jp1]

Have you found a legal or procedural flaw in the ruling?

Other than her stupid **** definition of quarantine?

[Yppej]

Already people took their masks off to eat or drink, and in typical covid privilege the mask mandate was not enforced in first class. But quake in your boots if you think random pieces of cloth or surgical masks with big gaps on the sides do anything. Be afraid, be very afraid - then the government can control you.

[jp1]

and in typical covid privilege the mask mandate was not enforced in first class.

Source?

[Yppej]

Source?

Passengers.

[Alan]

Other than her stupid **** definition of quarantine?

In my scanning of the 59 page decision I didn't notice the judge's definition of quarantine, although she did reference the term as it has previously been applied in other court and legislative renderings. As an example, several courts last year ruled that the mandatory wearing of a mask was a form of personal quarantine and without a lawful quarantine order, forcing people to wear masks exceeded government authority.

Is the use of that standing legal principle the one you find stupid?

Edited to add: The ruling can be found here for anyone interested.

[Tybee]

As an example, several courts last year ruled that the mandatory wearing of a mask was a form of personal quarantine and without a lawful quarantine order, forcing people to wear masks exceeded government authority.

That seems very reasonable to me. Frankly, I feel that government exceeded its authority extensively over the past two years.

[jp1]

In my scanning of the 59 page decision I didn't notice the judge's definition of quarantine, although she did reference the term as it has previously been applied in other court and legislative renderings. As an example, several courts last year ruled that the mandatory wearing of a mask was a form of personal quarantine and without a lawful quarantine order, forcing people to wear masks exceeded government authority.

Is the use of that standing legal principle the one you find stupid?

Edited to add: The ruling can be found here for anyone interested.

I wish I had a republican dictionary so I could better keep up with all the changes to our language. Like how groomer now means any LGBT person who is out as an LGBT person. And how, apparently since the pandemic began, wearing a mask is a form of isolation.

[Yppej]

Are burkhas isolating?

[bae]

Are burkhas isolating?

[Alan]

I wish I had a republican dictionary so I could better keep up with all the changes to our language. Like how groomer now means any LGBT person who is out as an LGBT person. And how, apparently since the pandemic began, wearing a mask is a form of isolation.

Oh, I thought you had a definable problem with the content of the ruling you mentioned earlier rather than just a rant about all things Republican. Sorry about that!

As an aside, and not to further hijack an already rambling thread, do you think your generalized rants are examples of the disinformation on social media that several prominent Democrats such as Obama and Clinton have recently called 'a threat to Democracy'?