Originally Posted by frugal-one
From this article is this conclusion:
So the fact that four justices voted to hear Moore doesn’t mean that a majority is willing to endorse the unprecedented arguments offered by the state lawmakers in the case. The Court could still reject the theory and reaffirm the way our elections have worked for over two centuries.
so no, it isnt a done deal. But that said—
This is an opinion article. It is the opinion of Berenstein and sweren-Becker. What is YOUR opinion? Are you relying on the opinion of these two authors? Isn’t this exactly what you berate me for doing?
Personally, I think it’s a good article but – it’s just an opinion, a projection of what the United States Supreme Court might do and why.
Reply With Quote