Page 105 of 249 FirstFirst ... 55595103104105106107115155205 ... LastLast
Results 1,041 to 1,050 of 2484

Thread: Why NOT to vote Republican

  1. #1041
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,265
    Quote Originally Posted by LDAHL View Post
    I’m a dude who thinks Mandela Barnes would be worse for the country than Ron Johnson. You don’t need to slather on a lot of your Manichean narrative to explain it.

    I don’t think much of the Trumpists, but I also don’t think much of his opposition’s agenda.
    And I don’t think much of people who don’t think that participating in an attempt to overthrow the government isnt a disqualifying event for holding public office.

  2. #1042
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,265
    I wonder how many Georgians who watched their senate debate noticed that the guy who threatened his wife with a gun, had several kids whose existence he denies, and paid for a mistress’s abortion was also the guy who was constantly quoting scripture while the actual Christian pastor never felt the need to mention the Bible?

  3. #1043
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,265
    I'm impressed. Ron Johnson showed that republicans actually can do comedy that doesn't involve punching down!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bhKJwobzRk

  4. #1044
    Senior Member JaneV2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,489
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    I'm impressed. Ron Johnson showed that republicans actually can do comedy that doesn't involve punching down!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bhKJwobzRk
    I adore Michael Steele.

  5. #1045
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,265
    And now we have confirmation. If the pro Putin party wins the house we won’t be sending any more aid to Ukraine.

    https://apnews.com/article/russia-uk...a4d238ec076f4a

  6. #1046
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,543
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    And now we have confirmation. If the pro Putin party wins the house we won’t be sending any more aid to Ukraine.

    https://apnews.com/article/russia-uk...a4d238ec076f4a

    It has been evident for a long time who they are.

  7. #1047
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,864
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    And now we have confirmation. If the pro Putin party wins the house we won’t be sending any more aid to Ukraine.

    https://apnews.com/article/russia-uk...a4d238ec076f4a
    I don't think that's what the story says.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  8. #1048
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,864
    Quote Originally Posted by frugal-one View Post
    It has been evident for a long time who they are.
    By "who they are" do you mean the only ones interested in providing the oversight role required of their office?
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  9. #1049
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,265
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    I don't think that's what the story says.
    I’m sorry you lack the ability to read between the lines. But I suppose that’s related to your inability to admit that a Republican could ever do anything wrong. Ever.

  10. #1050
    Senior Member Rogar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    6,057
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    And now we have confirmation. If the pro Putin party wins the house we won’t be sending any more aid to Ukraine.

    https://apnews.com/article/russia-uk...a4d238ec076f4a
    Maybe, but I didn't get that from the article either. The fact that Trumpsters were no fan of NATO and it was America first might hint at possibilities. For now I think the GOP is likely to say anything to appeal to different factions and win a few votes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •