it is nothing to see because main stream media is not covering much of it, or they’re covering only the broad story that they’re forced to cover. were it a real story they would be all over it! /sOriginally Posted by LDAHL
I listened to NPR’s On The Media interview with Michael Sulzberger, New York Times publisher, who swears up down and sideways that his newspaper is not a liberally focused newspaper. Early in the podcast the interviewer said with a bit of exasperation “why don’t you just admit that it’s a liberal publication? that doesn’t discount your reporting is professional, thorough, and factual.”
Sulzberger wouldn’t budge.
I’m waiting for that NYT front page expose of Hunter Biden. I might then subscribe to it. How long will I have to wait?
Since I do not follow details of the Hunter Biden story, and there’s certainly smoke there don’t know about fire, the real story has always been the complacency of media and government officials to refuse to cover the story. Ongoing now for years. I enjoyed watching the New York Post reporter testify in front of Congress and give a beatdown to her journalistic colleagues. Yes, I know that the Post is a rag, but that girl has journalism chops. Just like the college freshman had journalism chops, the kid who brought down Stanford University’s president for his unrelenting investigation into cooked research published by the president. Just like that college sophomore who was key in bringing down Elizabeth Holmes.
The Internet has millions of little voices twittering incredibly stupid stuff, but the Internet also allows truth to rise to the top.
Reply With Quote