Totally agree IL!!!
When asked what he thought of another Trump/Biden contest, Bill Barr said “I’ll jump off that bridge when we come to it”.
It must take a certain kind of ego to convince yourself that you are better equipped at 80 years old to handle your extremely important job than anyone else around. I agree with you. If it winds up being a Biden/Trump contest, I will vote for Biden, not because I am pro-Biden. I'm pro-environmental policy and I don't see any candidate from the Green Party winning the election, and I certainly don't want to revisit the days of Trump rolling back 100 environmental regulations, inviting his business cronies to head the EPA, and removing protections from forests and indigenous sacred lands.
"Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
www.silententry.wordpress.com
So should I fire up a subscription to the New York Times so that I may read in-depth coverage of Joe Biden‘s interactions with his son’s business that centered on access to .daddy Joe? I would like to read the full story, carefully and thoroughly told. The New York Times would be the place, right?
The heat is getting hotter on President Biden and I now think there’s something “there “there.
NY Times seems to have quite a bit of coverage of Hunter.
Lots of good recipes too.
Have at it.
Not sure, I don't read the entire thing. To answer Iris' query, I simply did a by-date search for "Hunter Biden" stories from the last week, and got several pages of headline hits. The headlines alone seemed to indicate "bad news for the Bidens".
My assumption is that almost every politician of every stripe and their hanger-on family members are corrupt to the core and should be run out of town on a rail, it's a big timesaver.
The recipes though, very nice stuff.
I searched the NYT for both names: Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware. Nothing.
There is coverage in the NY Post, MSN, Newsweek and The Hill. Can't reliably search the Washington Post or WSJ.
It’s a shame for republicans that Archer’s testimony last week was such a dud. But I suppose just as we had 342 pointless investigations into BENGHAZI!!! BENGHAZI!!!!! BENGHAZI!!!! we’ll have endless sham investigations about Hunter biden. And of course in the meantime republicans will continue to be completely unconcerned about why the Saudi’s gave Jared kushner $2 billion.
So, one of Hunter Biden’s legal charges is a federal gun charge. I have not been paying much attention to the Hunter Biden story, but this makes me wonder what the gun control crowd thinks.
I understand that if the brothers in St. Louis with their illegally held guns aren’t being prosecuted, I wouldn’t much expect Hunter Biden to be prosecuted, but, that can’t be a universal point of view, right? What do you gun control folks think about this? Don’t you think we should enforce the gun laws we have? Piling on more gun laws isn’t going to help any situation if we aren’t willing to enforce what we have on the books.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)