Why even argue about how to address the mental health aspects of dealing with a case like this. His mom was receiving an alimony of some 24k *A MONTH* (or such is what I read, though yea it sounds unbelievable, really a month? not a year?). Let that sink in. 24k a month. And how that kind of money has nothing whatsoever to do with how life is experienced for most people. Half the country probably lives on that a year, then consider all the rest that live on that every 6 months (earn 48k a year) or every 4 etc. etc.. They didn't have money for shrinks or meds or whatever? (actually he was on meds, cue Jane)

But anyway unless they had some major hidden expense, no way, they have money for any mental health they would like to try. They have money coming out of their tiolet pretty much, with that kind of income, and yes I realized it is probably pretty well taxed, but nontheless. The only mental health argument to be made in a case like this is involuntary confinement, and that's ugly, sure you want to go down *that* particular road?

I mean sure one can argue that many people can not afford adequate mental health in this country, and so on, and I'm sure it's true, but that doesn't apply to these folks. That income probably literally puts them in the 1% (although of course that's not actually what occupy means by the phrase, they actually mean more the .1% - they mean money that becomes power in this society).