I'm not proposing anything. I'm supporting what others are proposing. I referred to the folks who are making such proposals in the very same message you replied to! If you're not going to read the messages you reply to, then what are you doing? It seems to me that you're just throwing things up against the wall to try to find some way of dodge or evading the points being presented to you. Reasonable people disagree with you. Get over it.
Why do you think that each and every proposal must utterly and completely eliminate the possibility of any random event that you choose to focus on in the moment? That rhetorical tactic is a pretty cynical way of trying to evade the points being made, regarding reducing risk (which you disagree with, but reasonable people disagree with you about that, something which you still haven't clearly acknowledged, despite several invitations to do so). With every new rhetorical game you play, you're underscoring the basis for the concerns that reasonable people who disagree with you have about the grounding of your advocacy.